- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 宗族文化对家务分工的影响——基于CFPS2010数据的实证分析    

姓名:

 邹宏威    

学科名称:

 经济学类 - 经济学    

学生类型:

 学士    

学位名称:

 经济学学士    

学校:

 中国人民大学    

院系:

 劳动人事学院    

专业:

 劳动经济学    

第一导师姓名:

 葛玉好    

完成日期:

 2019-04-26    

提交日期:

 2019-04-26    

奖项名称:

 中国人民大学优秀本科毕业论文二等奖    

颁奖单位:

 中国人民大学    

获奖时间:

 2019    

中文关键词:

 宗族文化 ; 家务分工 ; 家谱 ; 社会压力    

外文关键词:

 Clan culture ; Household work ; Genealogy ; Conformism    

中文摘要:

本文利用中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)2010年的数据,以家谱作为宗族文化的代理变量,探究宗族文化对家庭内的性别劳动分工的影响。本文主要的发现为,有家谱的家庭相比于无家谱的家庭,男性的家务时间在夫妻总家务时间中的占比更低。进一步地,本文试图区分文化的纵向家庭传递和横向社会压力两股力量,并发现主导男性家务劳动决策的关键是社区环境的压力,即所在村居的大多数家庭的家务模式,影响到每一位男性在家务中的角色。当使用不同的宗族文化的衡量方式,更大范围的文化社区定义以及选择不同的样本和模型等稳健性检验之后,上述结论也基本成立。宗族文化形成的社会压力主要对男性的家务劳动时间产生影响,对女性的影响不显著,对照顾家人的时间占比的影响也不显著。而且,宗族文化的效应在农村更加明显,城市则由于现代化程度较高,难再受到宗族文化的影响。对于中国的不同省份来说,宗族文化对于男性家务时间占比也呈现不同程度的影响。文化作为非正式制度往往变化缓慢,因此可以预见宗族文化对于家务分工格局的影响还将持续。但现代化和市场化的发展,以及针对社区的文化宣传政策,将有利于家庭内部的性别平等的发展。

外文摘要:

Using data from CFPS (2010), this paper uses the genealogy as a proxy variable of clan culture to study the impact of clan culture on the gender division of housework. This paper mainly finds that those husbands in the families with a genealogy bear a lower share of housework than those without a genealogy. Further, this paper distinguishes between two forces of culture persistence, i.e., intergenerational transmission and conformism, finding that husband’s share of housework depends more on the pressure from his community (conformism). Husbands conform to the traditional pattern of housework division in other families within the same community. And the conclusions above are robust to all kinds of tests, including alternative measurements of clan culture, alternative definition of community, more control variables, more accurate samples, and nonlinear models. The social pressure formed by clan culture mainly affects men, but not significant for wife’s housework time and husband’s share of time spent on caring for family. Also, the effects of clan culture are more significant in rural areas than urban areas, which have been more modernized. Moreover, clan culture also has different effects on the division of housework in different provinces in China. As an informal institution, clan culture will continue to influence household division of labor in the foreseeable future. However, modernization, marketization, and community-level policies on promoting culture of equality will surely promote gender equality.

总页码:

 28    

参考文献:

[1] 陈斌开,陈思宇.流动的社会资本——传统宗族文化是否影响移民就业?[J].经济研究,2018,53(03):35-49.

[2] 郭云南,姚洋.宗族网络与农村劳动力流动[J].管理世界,2013(03):69-81+187-188.

[3] 刘爱玉,佟新,付伟.双薪家庭的家务性别分工:经济依赖、性别观念或情感表达[J].社会,2015,35(02):109-136.

[4] 於嘉.性别观念、现代化与女性的家务劳动时间[J].社会,2014,34(02):166-192.

[5] 张川川,马光荣.宗族文化、男孩偏好与女性发展[J].世界经济,2017,40(03):122-143.

[6] 甄美荣.关于家务劳动的经济学研究综述[J].妇女研究论丛,2009(02):73-78.

[7] Alesina A, Giuliano P, Nunn N. On the origins of gender roles: Women and the plough[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2013, 128(2): 469-530.

[8] Alesina A, Giuliano P. Culture and institutions[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2015, 53(4): 898-944.

[9] Akerlof G A, Kranton R E. Economics and identity[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000, 115(3): 715-753.

[10] Becker A. On the Economic Origins of Female Genital Cutting[J]. Available at SSRN, 2018.

[11] Becker G S. A Treatise on the Family[M]. Harvard university press, 1991.

[12] Bianchi S M, Milkie M A, Sayer L C, et al. Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor[J]. Social Forces, 2000, 79(1):191-228.

[13] Desmet K , Wacziarg R . The Cultural Divide[J]. NBER Working Papers, 2018.

[14] Doepke M, Kindermann F. Bargaining over babies: Theory, evidence, and policy implications[J]. NBER Working Papers, 2016.

[15] Greif A, Tabellini G. Cultural and institutional bifurcation: China and Europe compared[J]. American Economic Review, 2010, 100(2): 135-40.

[16] Greif A , Tabellini G . The Clan and the City: Sustaining Cooperation in China and Europe[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2017.

[17] Grosjean P, Khattar R. It’s raining men! Hallelujah? The long-run consequences of male-biased sex ratios[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2018, 86(2): 723-754.

[18] Hwang J, Lee C, Lee E. Gender norms and housework time allocation among dual-earner couples[J]. Labour Economics, 2019, 57: 102-116.

[19] Kamo Y. A Nonlinear Effect of the Number of Children on the Division of Household Labor[J]. Sociological Perspectives, 1991, 34(2):205-218.

[20] Paola Giuliano, Nathan Nunn. Understanding Cultural Persistence and Change[J] . NBER Working Papers, 2019.

[21] Talhelm T, Zhang X, Oishi S, et al. Large-scale psychological differences within China explained by rice versus wheat agriculture[J]. Science, 2014, 344(6184): 603-608.

[22] World Economic Forum, The Global Gender Gap Report 2018 [M]. World Economic Forum, 2018.

[23] Xu Y, Yao Y. Informal institutions, collective action, and public investment in rural China[J]. American Political Science Review, 2015, 109(2): 371-391.

[24] Zhang Chuanchuan. Family support or social support? The role of clan culture[J]. Journal of Population Economics, 2019: 1-21.

开放日期:

 2019-05-14    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式