& ltp& gt& ltp& gt历经数年的积淀与成长，专利间接侵权制度的法律地位已被部分发达国家逐步确立。目前，作为共同侵权制度的衍生，专利间接侵权制度存在的必要性受到我国学界大多数人的认同。需要指出的是，专利间接侵权是否需要以专利直接侵权的发生为前提，即根据专利间接侵权是否需要以直接侵权成立为要件，分持&ldquo从属说&rdquo与&ldquo独立说&rdquo两种看法。此次《专利法》送审稿体现出我国立法机关支持&ldquo从属说&rdquo的观点，且未规定例外情形。然而，随着科技发展及信息共享不断深化，终端消费者在各类服务提供商的帮助下可以实施部分专利侵权步骤取得专利产品。现行的《专利法》认为，由于各类服务提供商对专利方法或专利产品所为的行为，并未以生产经营为目的，其缺少构成专利侵权的构成要件，不构成专利侵权行为，而各类服务提供商的侵权帮助行为或引诱行为在&ldquo从属说&rdquo的观点下亦因不构成直接侵权行为而无法被规制。在类似案件日益增多的今天，为了更加公平、合理地处理，笔者建议我国专利间接侵权制度应以&ldquo从属说&rdquo为原则，以&ldquo独立说&rdquo为例外，妥帖处置专利权人权益与社会公众利益间的关系。& lt/p& gt& lt/p& gt

& ltp& gt& ltp& gtAfter years of accumulation and development, the legal status of system of indirect infringement of patent has gradually been erected by some developed ries. Currently, as derivative of the system of joint infringement, the necessity of system of patent indirect infringement is approved by most Chinese scholars. Meanwhile, whether indirect infringement should be on the premise of direct infringement or not, scholars have two different perspectives, which are &lsquosubordinationism&rsquo and &lsquoindependence&rsquo. Clearly, according to the draft of patent law, the legislature of China supports &lsquosubordinationism&rsquo with no exceptions. However, with the development of technology and information share, a variety of service providers can help end-consumers to implement some infringement procedure to get patented product. Based on the current patent law, since the purpose of all kinds of service providers that deal with patented methods and product is not production or management, it should not be treated as infringement act. Hence, from the perspective of &lsquosubordinationism&rsquo, how the service providers help and tempt to infringement cannot be regulated. Nowadays, in response to an increasing number of similar cases, the system of indirect infringement in China should take &lsquosubordinationism&rsquo as its principle while &lsquoindependence&rsquo as exception, deal with the relationship between patentees and the public properly.& lt/p& gt& lt/p& gt

王迁.知识产权间接侵权研究[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2008.

姬新江.共同侵权责任形态研究[M].北京：中国监察出版社，2012.

王迁.知识产权法教程[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社，2014.

张广良.知识产权侵权民事救济[M].北京:法律出版社,2003:83-84.

郑成思.知识产权论[M].北京:法律出版社,1998.

吴汉东.知识产权保护论[J].法学研究,2000& #402):152.

王卫国.过错责任原则:第三次勃兴[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2000:67-69.

王泽鉴.侵权行为法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001:172.

谢在全.民法物权论:上[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999:143.

王卫国.过错责任原则:第三次勃兴[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2000:67-69.