企业履行社会责任存在两种动机：规范性动机和工具性动机。本文将切入一个特殊的理论
视角，来研究企业社会责任的工具性动机：对中国民营企业而言，企业社会责任是否会演化为
企业和政府交换资源的工具吗？何种类型的公司才能有效利用这种工具来从政府手中换取关键
性资源？ 对于这一类型的公司，企业社会责任会如何影响企业的技术创新？本文以 2014-2017
年中国上市民营公司为样本，并将其分为政治关联组和非政治关联组，分别通过实证检验系统
分析了企业社会责任是如何影响企业技术创新。本文结论表明：具有政治关联的企业能利用企
业社会责任作为一种工具来与政府交换资源，从而促进企业的技术创新。不具有政治关联的企
业无法把企业社会责任作为一种工具，只能出于规范性动机承担企业社会责任，因而将抑制企
业的技术创新行为

The enterprises have two different motivations to take corporate social responsibility: the normative 
motivation and the instrumental motivation. In this paper, we analyze the instrumental motivation of 
corporate social responsibility through a specific perspective: will corporate social responsibility evolve 
into an instrument for Chinese private enterprises to exchange resources with the governments? What 
types of enterprises can effectively use this instrument to exchange key resources from the government? 
For this type of company, what kind of impact will corporate social responsibility have on technological 
innovation of enterprises? To answer the above questions, this paper takes the 2014-2017 Chinese listed 
private companies as a sample and divides them into political connections group and non-political 
connections group. Through empirical test, it analyzes how corporate social responsibility affects 
technology innovation of enterprises. The conclusions of this paper indicate that enterprises with 
political connections can use corporate social responsibility as an instrument to exchange resources with 
the government, thus promoting technological innovation. Enterprises that do not have political 
connections cannot take corporate social responsibility as an instrument and can only fulfill corporate 
social responsibility for normative motivation, thus inhibiting technological innovation of enterprises.

[1] [澳]苏哈布拉塔·博比·班纳吉. 企业社会责任：经典观点与理念的冲突[M].柳学永、叶

素贞译.北京：经济管理出版社，2013:11-36。

[2] 王海兵、刘莎、韩彬.内部控制、财务绩效对企业社会责任的影响研究——基于 A 股上市

公司的经验分析[J].税务与经济，2015,(6):1-9。

[3] 肖红军、阳镇.中国企业社会责任 40 年：历史演进、逻辑演化与未来展望[J].经济学

家,2018,(11)。

[4] 戴亦一,潘越,冯舒.中国企业的慈善捐赠是一种“政治献金”吗?——来自市委书记更替的

证据[J].经济研究,2014,49(02):74-86.

[5] 杜兴强,曾泉,杜颖洁.政治联系、过度投资与公司价值——基于国有上市公司的经验证据

[J].金融研究,2011(08):93-110.

[6] 杜兴强,曾泉,杜颖洁.政治联系对中国上市公司的 R&D 投资具有“挤出”效应吗?[J].投资

研究,2012,31(05):98-113.

[7] 杜兴强,曾泉,王亚男.寻租、R&D 投资与公司业绩——基于民营上市公司的经验证据[J].投

资研究,2012,31(01):57-70.

[8] 李增福,汤旭东,连玉君.中国民营企业社会责任背离之谜[J].管理世界,2016(09):136-

148+160+188.

[9] 权小锋,吴世农,尹洪英.企业社会责任与股价崩盘风险:“价值利器”或“自利工

具”?[J].经济研究,2015,50(11):49-64.

[10] 苏冬蔚,贺星星.社会责任与企业效率:基于新制度经济学的理论与经验分析[J].世界经

济,2011,34(09):138-159.

[11] 何辉.如何理解我国的企业社会责任现状:政府和企业关系的视角[J].中国社会科学院研

究生院学报,2013(03):139-144.

[12] 袁建国,后青松,程晨.企业政治资源的诅咒效应——基于政治关联与企业技术创新的考察

[J].管理世界,2015(01):139-155.

[13] 唐松,孙铮.政治关联、高管薪酬与企业未来经营绩效[J].管理世界,2014(05):93-

105+187-188.

第13页

[14] 张敏,张胜,王成方,申慧慧.政治关联与信贷资源配置效率——来自我国民营上市公司的

经验证据[J].管理世界,2010(11):143-153.

[15] 张峰,黄玖立,王睿.政府管制、非正规部门与企业创新:来自制造业的实证依据[J].管理

世界,2016(02):95-111+169.

[16] 梅亮,陈劲.责任式创新:源起、归因解析与理论框架[J].管理世界,2015(08):39-57.

[17] 李文茜,刘益.技术创新、企业社会责任与企业竞争力——基于上市公司数据的实证分析

[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(01):154-165.

[18] 柳卸林,高雨辰,丁雪辰.寻找创新驱动发展的新理论思维——基于新熊彼特增长理论的思

考[J].管理世界,2017(12):8-19.

[19] Abowd, J., Milkovich, G. and Hannon, J. (1990). The Effects of Human Resource

Management Decisions on Shareholder Value. Industrial and Labor Relations Review,

43, 203–36.

[20] Bagnoli, M. and Watts, S. (2003). Selling to Socially Responsible Consumers:

Competition and the Private Provision of Public Goods. Journal of Economics and

Management Strategy, 12, 419–45.

[21] Barnard, C. (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard

University Press.

[22] Baron, D. (2001). Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility and

Integrated Strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10, 7–45.

[23] Donaldson, L. and Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory:

CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16, 49–

64.

[24] Donaldson, T. and Preston, L. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the

Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review,

20, 65–91.

[25] Feddersen, T. and Gilligan, T. (2001). Saints and Markets: Activists and the

Supply of Credence Goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10, 149–

第14页

71.

[26] Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Perspective.

Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

[27] Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its

Profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13.

[28] Ghemawat, P. (2001). Strategy and the Business Landscape. Upper Saddle, NJ:

Prentice Hall.

[29] Hart, S. (1995). A Natural Resource‐Based View of the Firm. Academy of

Management Review, 20, 986–1014.

[39] Hillman, A. and Keim, G. (1995). International Variation in the Business‐

Government Interface: Institutional and Organizational Considerations. Academy of

Management Review, 20, 193–214.

[31] Hillman, A. and Keim, G. (2001). Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management,

and Social Issues: What's the Bottom Line?. Strategic Management Journal, 22,

125–39.

[32] Levitt, T. (1958). The Dangers of Social Responsibility. Harvard Business

Review, September–October, 41–50.

[33] Lockett, A. and Thompson, S. (2004). Edith Penrose's Contributions to the

Resource‐Based View of Strategic Management: An Alternative Perspective. Journal

of Management Studies, 41, 192–204.

[34] Marcus, A. A. and Anderson, M. H. (2006). A General Dynamic Capability: Does

It Propagate Business and Social Competencies in the Retail Food Industry?.

Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1, 19–46.

[35] McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (1997). Event Studies in Management Research:

Theoretical and Empirical Issues. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 626–57.

[36] McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate Social Responsibility and

Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?. Strategic Management

第15页

Journal, 21, 603–9.

[37] Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. and Rynes, S. (2003). Corporate Social and

Financial Performance: A Meta‐Analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–41.

[38] Posnikoff, J. (1997). Disinvestment from South Africa: They Did Well by Doing

Good. Contemporary Economic Policy, 15, 76–86.

[39] Siegel, D. (2001). Do British Companies Really Need a Minister to Make Them

Socially Responsible?. Parliamentary Brief, 7, 7–8, Special Supplement on

Business and the Community.

[40] Wright, P. and Ferris, S. (1997). Agency Conflict and Corporate Strategy: The

Effect of Divestment on Corporate Value. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 77–83.