当今世界贸易格局并不稳定，国际贸易壁垒的形式趋向多样化、贸易壁垒的标准趋向严格化。关税等传统贸易壁垒仍存，随着科技的发展与贸易的深入进行，以技术法规、标准和检验检疫要求等为主要内容的技术性贸易措施，出现在国际贸易中的次数急剧上升，甚至有逐步取代传统贸易壁垒的趋势。对于中国，我国制造业产品出口正屡屡遭受技术性贸易壁垒的规制。制造业的创新能力是国家战略性关注问题。技术性贸易壁垒对中国制造行业的创新能力是否有倒逼的激励效应，是一个日益突显但学界尚未有定论的问题。本文运用固定效应模型，深入探究技术性贸易壁垒对中国制造业创新的影响。本文发现：技术性贸易壁垒在短期对出口的负面影响会对出口国创新发展形成倒逼机制,能够鼓励制造业企业开展创新并且在两年后有所表现。同时技术性贸易壁垒对高科技制造业的激励效应大于非高科技制造业。本文基于中国制造业2011-2019年行业数据得出实证分析结论，填补了技术性贸易壁垒在调节变量上的文献空白，也为国内企业与中国政府在面对中国制造业的技术性贸易壁垒时的创新举措提供借鉴。

The trade pattern in today's world is not stable, and the trend of "anti-globalization" has repeatedly appeared in inter-country trade, the forms of international trade barriers are tending to be diversified, and the standards of trade barriers are becoming stricter. For China, the export of Manufactured Products in China is repeatedly subject to technical trade barriers. The innovation capacity of the manufacturing industry is a national strategic concern. Whether technical trade barriers have a negative incentive effect on the innovation ability of China's manufacturing industry is an increasingly prominent but inconclusive question in the academic community. This paper uses a fixed-effect model to explore the impact of technical trade barriers on manufacturing innovation in China. This paper finds that the negative effect of technical trade barriers on exports in the short term will have a backward mechanism for technological innovation in exporting countries, which can incentivize enterprises to carry out technological innovation and be reflected after two years, while the incentive effect of technical trade barriers on high-tech manufacturing is greater than that of non-high-tech manufacturing. Based on the industry data of China's manufacturing industry from 2011 to 2019, this paper draws empirical analysis conclusions, fills the literature gap of technical trade barriers in regulating variables, and also provides reference for the innovative measures of domestic enterprises.

[1] Adam B. Jaffe and Karen Palmer. Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1997, 79(4) : 610-619.．

[2] Shin, H. and Lee, K. (2012), Asymmetric trade protection leading not to productivity but to export share change. Economics of Transition,20:745-785.

[3] Tsuyoshi Toshimitsu. On the effects of emission standards as a non-tariff barrier to trade in the case of a foreign Bertrand duopoly: A note[J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2008, 30(4) : 578-584.

[4] 鲍晓华,朱达明.技术性贸易壁垒的差异化效应:国际经验及对中国的启示[J].世界经济,2015,38(11):71-89.

[5] 卜海.技术性贸易壁垒的南北差异:表现、原因和趋势展望[J].财贸经济,2004(02):63-67.

[6] 崔景华,杜美欣,李浩研.技术性贸易措施对高新技术产业出口及创新的影响研究——基于跨国面板数据的实证分析[J].海关与经贸研究,2021,42(01):1-17.

[7] 代碧波,孙东生,姚凤阁.我国制造业技术创新效率的变动及其影响因素——基于2001-2008年29个行业的面板数据分析[J].情报杂志,2012,31(03):185-191+123.

[8] 李平,田朔,刘廷华.贸易壁垒对中国技术创新的影响——兼论政府的作用发挥[J].国际贸易问题,2014(02):105-114.

[9] 李小平,朱钟棣.国际贸易的技术溢出门槛效应——基于中国各地区面板数据的分析[J].统计研究,2004(10):27-32.

[10] 刘章生,宋德勇,弓媛媛,罗传建.中国制造业绿色技术创新能力的行业差异与影响因素分析[J].情报杂志,2017,36(01):194-200.

[11] 卢福永,蒙双.发达国家技术性贸易壁垒效应及分析——基于中国机电产品出口贸易的实证研究[J].现代管理科学,2016(06):97-99.

[12] 王冠宇,张庆彩,郭伟.技术性贸易壁垒与异质性企业出口行为：退出还是升级？[J].技术经济,2021,40(01):118-127.

[13] 王绍媛,李国鹏,曲德龙.装备制造业技术性贸易壁垒与技术创新研究[J].财经问题研究,2014(03):31-38.

[14] 王杨阳. 不同行业技术创新绩效影响因素比较研究[D].江南大学,2017.

[15] 王志明,袁建新.技术性贸易壁垒的影响及中国的对策[J].世界经济,2003(07):31-34.

[16] 谢娟娟,梁虎诚.TBT影响我国高新技术产品出口的理论与实证研究[J].国际贸易问题,2008(01):34-41.

[17] 徐惟,卜海.技术性贸易壁垒设置与出口国创新决策的博弈分析[J].现代经济探讨,2019(06):79-85.

[18] 姚明月,胡麦秀.外生性的技术性贸易壁垒条件下出口企业技术创新的行为选择[J].研究与发展管理,2016,28(02):33-39.

[19] 张美莎,冯涛.国际环境监管能够倒逼上游企业创新吗?——来自中国制造业的经验证据[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2020,40(01):48-56.

[20] 赵文霞,杨经国.贸易多样化和技术创新:出口波动的稳定器——贸易壁垒减弱出口波动的机制与中国经验[J].西部论坛,2021,31(02):27-39.