本文试图以黑格尔对古代怀疑论和近代怀疑论的区分为中心，处理他的哲学体系和怀疑论的复杂关系。黑格尔关于这个区分的讨论主要集中在“怀疑主义和哲学的关系”以及《哲学史讲演录》等文本中。本文也将围绕这些重要作品展开。导言部分简要厘清了问题的背景。第一节通过对现代哲学意义上“近代怀疑论”和“古代怀疑论”概念的修正，澄清了二者的基本含义。第二节则结合哲学史，指出黑格尔将要处理的近代怀疑论的基本形态是“舒尔策式怀疑论”。黑格尔将其和独断论划上等号。第三节先论证黑格尔如何用古代怀疑论消解并完成近代怀疑论，再说明了黑格尔将要处理的古代怀疑论的基本形态是以“均衡方法”以及以它为基础的“二律背反”，并表明了古代怀疑论带来的问题。第四节则试图在近代怀疑论和古代怀疑论区分的视角下，简单勾勒黑格尔处理怀疑论的基本思路。最后，结语部分总结了全文。

This paper intends to deal with the complex relationship between Hegel's philosophical system and skepticism in the perspective of Hegel's distinction between "ancient skepticism" and "modern skepticism". Hegel discusses this distinction mainly in texts such as "The Relation between Skepticism and Philosophy" and Lectures on the History of Philosophy. This paper will also focus on these major works. The introduction briefly discusses the problem. The first part of this paper shows the meaning of "modern skepticism" and "ancient skepticism" by revising their concepts in the modern philosophical sense. In the second section, it is pointed out that the basic form of modern skepticism that Hegel will deal with is "Schulzean skepticism" in the framework of the history of philosophy. Hegel equates it with dogmatism. The third section shows how Hegel uses ancient skepticism to dissolve and complete modern skepticism, and then argues that the basic form of ancient skepticism that Hegel will deal with is the "Method of Equipollence" and the "Antinomies" based on the it. And then this part presents the problems caused by ancient skepticism. The fourth section tries to reconstruct the basic idea of Hegel's treatment of skepticism in the light of the distinction between those two kinds of skepticism. Finally, the concluding section concludes this paper.

[1] Comesa?a, J. and Peter K. (2019). Skepticism, In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = .

[2] [法]笛卡尔. 第一哲学沉思集[M]. 庞景仁译. 北京：商务印书馆，1986.

[3] [古罗马]第欧根尼·拉尔修. 名哲言行录（下）[M]. 马永翔等译. 吉林：吉林人民出版社，2003.

[4] Fine, G. (2003). Sextus and External World Scepticism, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 23, 341–385.

[5] Forster, M. (1989). Hegel and Skepticism. Cambridge & London: Harvard University Press.

[6] Forster, M. (2008). Kant and Skepticism. Princeton & Woodstock: Princeton University Press.

[7] [德]黑格尔. 精神现象学（上）[M]. 贺麟、王玖兴译. 北京：商务印书馆，1979.

[8] [德]黑格尔. 哲学史讲演录（第三卷）[M]. 贺麟、王太庆译. 北京：商务印书馆，1959.

[9] Hegel, G. (2000). On the Relationship of Skepticism to Philosophy. In Between Kant and Hegel: Texts in the Development of Post-Kantian Idealism, H. S. Harris & G. Giovanni (ed.). Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

[10] [德]黑格尔. 小逻辑[M]. 梁志学译. 北京：人民出版社，2017.

[11] [德]迪特·亨利希. 在康德与黑格尔之间[M]. 乐小军译. 北京：商务印书馆，2020.

[12] [英]休谟. 人类理智研究[M]. 吕大吉译. 北京：商务印书馆，1999.

[13] 荆晶. 黑格尔对古代怀疑主义的重新阐释——基于黑格尔早期构建其哲学体系路径的考察[J]. 湖北社会科学. 2017，（3）: 95-101.

[14] 荆晶. 黑格尔关于怀疑主义的批判及其意义——以《怀疑主义与哲学的关系》为研究中心[J]. 云南大学学报（社会科学版），2019，（1）: 13-20.

[15] 荆晶. 怀疑主义在《精神现象学》中的双重身份[J]. 江西社会科学，2019，（5）: 43-49.

[16] [德]康德. 未来形而上学导论[M]. 庞景仁译. 北京：商务印书馆，1978.

[17] [德]康德. 纯粹理性批判[M]. 邓晓芒译. 杨祖陶校. 北京：人民出版社，2004.

[18] [美]罗伯特·皮平. 黑格尔的观念论[M]. 陈虎平译. 北京：华夏出版社，2006.

[19] Redding, P. (2020). Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition) . Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = < https: // plato.stanford.edu /archives /spr2020 /entries /hegel/>.

[20] Schulze, G. (2000). Aenesidemus. In Between Kant and Hegel: Texts in the Development of Post-Kantian Idealism, H. S. Harris & G. Giovanni (ed.). Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

[21] [古罗马]塞克斯都·恩披里克. 悬搁判断与心灵宁静[M]. 包利民等译. 北京：中国社会科学出版社，2004.

[22] Vogt, K. (2018). Ancient Skepticism. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = .

[23] Williams, M. (2010). Descartes’ Transformation of the Sceptical Tradition. In the Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, Bett, R. (ed.) (pp.288-313). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[24] 周礼全. 黑格尔的辩证逻辑[M]. 北京：中国社会科学出版社，1989.